We live in a world of open and real-time communication, where people from across the world talk to each other irrespective of any boundaries. We live in an independent world, at least most of us do, and that independence along with the power of reach and expression has put us all in a constant defence mode. We do not need to go out to be scrutinized; our social media presence or lack thereof is up for takes. Given the circumstances, let us discuss the answer to the question are we getting over sensitive?
Our world has always been full of bullies and nosy neighbours, but now with globalization and technological advancement, we continue to live in a society where our neighbours are determined by IP addresses. Bullies don’t need to harm us physically they can do so at the click of a button. Being oversensitive is a part of a defence mechanism and sometimes an automatic next step is to perpetrate an offence, for it is best known, the offence is the best defence.
When I was discussing this with my sister today
in the morning and told her about today’s blog, she sounded sceptical. Our
viewpoints have always been different, but her insights always force me to
think harder. Her point being is this from an individual perspective or
societal perspective, plus she raised another very important point. Is one
section of society getting oversensitive because of the insensitivity of other
sections?
I will start with the first point.
Sensitivity is always personal and to some extent, it is an extension of our
vulnerability. I am fat, so I am sensitive about all body-shaming joke. In fact, I still remember when my book was released; one of the first few
comments was about my weight. I am not sure how that affected my writing, but
the gentleman made it a point to talk about it. I moved on, but the memory has
stayed with me.
There is another way to look at it though;
fat shaming could be personal for me, what about racism, or casteism, or sexism
or so many other isms that may or may not directly related to me. Am I sure that I can stay away? Why did SSR
appeal to so many people’s sensitivities? Sridevi’s death was also
controversial but it failed to move the people like SSR did. More than the reason it could also be something to do with the timing of the incident, when
people were already trying to grapple with the uncertainty and unfairness of
life during corona time, news like this can make someone question the entire
system, and rightly so.
Sensitivity
is not just about how closely we relate to the issue but also the how we are feeling in
that moment.
This brings me to the second question, about growing insensitivity in people resulting in over-sensitivity in some. I find Hathras a perfect example. State apathy can only make someone question the safety of a woman in the state and country as a whole. However, if you look at the news you realize, it is not just about injustice against a woman. It has an aspect of state failure, system apathy and something that Indian politics thrives on, caste-based politics. There is a huge social media movement to take action against the culprits. The silences of those in a decision-making position will forces masses to take the protests in their hand. Is it the right? I don’t know, but it does seem to be one way of getting the victim’s voice heard.
Sensitivity
is an attempt to make things right by feeling uncomfortable and voicing it
out.
Our parents said and we have also been witness
to a pre-internet era. I remember going to my uncle’s house to study the Bermuda Triangle because he had a collection of the encyclopedia. Now my kids look
at Wikipedia, and they aren’t really interested in Bermuda Triangle. They are
more aware of climate change and global warming. Greta Thunberg, Autumn
Petltier of Canada, Leah Namugerwa of Uganda, and Ridhima Pandey closer home
are some names which are actively sensitizing the world on the impact of
climate change. Ignorance is bliss and knowledge is power and today’s
generation has the knowledge and is using it to bring about a change.
Sensitivity
is choosing knowledge over ignorance and empowering others to see the same.
Coming back to my first question, are we
oversensitive? My answer to that is, no, given the current situation we are
just the right amount of sensitive so let us take pride in our sensitivity,
instead of condemning it.

Personally I feel SSR or Sridevi case has nothing to do with sensitivity. Both cases were of celebrity. We keep them on certain pedestal however if we are not affected by things which are happening in our society, it is scary.
ReplyDeleteIt is true, Sridevi, SSR, Manisha, munni, gudia, pankaj, ravi hardly matter. What does matter is a reason that stirs a change in people. I am planning to dedicate one blog to that, what happens when we become sensitive. How does it positively motivate us!
DeleteWow.. Very nicely written
ReplyDeleteThank you so much. Your kind words are appreciated.
DeleteNicely written. Makes us think about many issues we come across daily in life but than don't address them much due to our so called scheduled life time table and when we are stuck up and unable to point a reasonable fact we say "that is life".
ReplyDeleteVery true, even when we get affected or disturbed we sometimes do not respond because our priorities are laid out in front of us. The timing is the key and that is what I have tried and present in my blog
Delete